The High Price for Delayed Obedience | LiveForgiven
Also, social unrest is often prevented because the system is patchedin some piecemeal way when (and sometimes only when) some aspect of itis persuasively and dramatically demonstrated, to a society of fair-mindedand reasonable people, to have a particularly egregious or widespread badresult. Thus a system of law based on equating morality with psychologywill often mistakenly seem to function satisfactorily even when it doesnot, because the system will be changed if it sufficiently troublesthe conscience or psychology of sufficient people. The problem is thatit will be changed only if it does that, and thus it has the potentialto be very bad until enough people are rightfully troubled enough and canconvince people in power to make needed changes. In other words, serioussocial unrest will usually be averted by the system, when pressure becomestoo great, but below that threshold, government sanctioned or induced harmand injustice can still befall people. In some cases civil disobedienceis meant to demonstrate that the threshold needs to be seen to have beenreached -- that certain laws and practices are too unjust or harmful tobe continued to be tolerated. But civil disobedience only works when governmentsand those in power or positions of influence have sufficient moral understandingand sensitivity to recognize protesters are in the right and the legalsystem is not. It is impossible to imagine that Jews would have effectedany change in Nazi behavior through civil disobedience, or that Kurds wouldhave softened Saddam Hussein's treatment of them.
Ephe 1 verse 4- Calvinism Vs Arminianism Vs …
Some LDS apologists try to compare the lying about polygamy to the situation during WWII wherein European Jews would lie about their ancestry or hide other Jews to keep the Nazis from sending them to the concentration camps. Not only are such analogies ridiculous and shameful, they're not even applicable to the polygamy situation: Joseph Smith & Co. never publicly advocated polygamy, nor did they protest any laws against it or seek to change any laws via "civil disobedience."
This is a statement of the ideal or of the goal. In any practical casepeople may disagree about what is tolerable or not, and that disagreementshould be worked through, in an attempt to resolve it, in a morally acceptableand reasonable way. I will not write here about how to deal with civildisobedience based on genuine disagreements of conscience, but presumablythere should be some reasonable and fair way to deal with such cases. Itshould also be understood that even where there are grounds for civil disobedience,there can be wrongful acts of civil disobedience, such as, in some cases,assassinating those who disagree with you over an issue that does not justifysuch murder.
Morality and Law Essay - garlikov
With a historically grounded analysis, and a focus on early deployments of activist DDOS as well as modern instances to trace its development over time, The Coming Swarm uses activist DDOS actions as the foundation of a larger analysis of the practice of disruptive civil disobedience on the internet.