There should be no animal cloning.

Like stated previously, therapeutic cloning does not involve the creation of a live human being.

Human cloning has many possible benefits, but it comes with concerns.

Banning cloning on farm animals will not only benefit the animals that are experimented on, but it can prevent risks that could appear in humans from ingesting the food made from the cloned animals.

In my opinion it would be too dangerous to legalise human cloning.

All that aside...If scientists continue this experimenting, they will start cloning human beings, and if that information for doing this gets out to the wrong people, crimes such as kidnapping to clone people would scare us all to leave our houses in the morning. Think about it. If anyone got a hold of our DNA, they could use it to clone us and steal our identity. Maybe I'm just thinking way too far out of the box, but it is possible, right?

If the West bans human cloning research, then it will be defenceless should a rogue nation (that wouldn't recognise such a ban) uses human cloning research to engineer the latest bio weapons to use for acts of terrorism.

If cloning can prove beneficial to human life, why not?

What is the downfall of human cloning? One would be the world lack of genetic diversity . The world will become an ideal living environment with "perfect people" that are all genetically alike . It may also instigate fraud and bad practice as the Black Market gets involved in selling stolen or defected clones . Because cloning is generally a new process and still in it's early stages there would be many uncertainty and risks .The procedure may actually cause more deaths in human beings wherephysical harm can be done to an embryo as well as a child. Because aperfect human being can be created, humans that do not have the desiredcharacter traits will not be socially accepted, .

Human cloning should be legalised.

Because of the controversies against this practice, the United States would not open the door to reproductive cloning, and this lead to a debate between the government, and scientists and bioethicists- who are supporting human cloning....

I think that human cloning should be banned.

There are numerous ways where cloning will further aid inscientific development and help the advancement of scientific knowledgeof humans. Human cloning can allow rebirth of deceased humans, curediseases especially those related to genetics, and discover new dataand ideas . It can prevent endangered species from disappearing as well as allow healthier human beings, .It will allow doctors to research and determine the cause ofspontaneous abortions as well as research rapid cell growth of cancercells . .New organs that genetically match the recipient may be produced as wellas allow regeneration of nerve tissues and other damaged tissues, andfurther study in genetics, human body development, and medicine . . .Agricultural and livestock can also be improved where scientist canalter clone organisms with preferable better traits or idealcharacteristics . All this will allow the people of science to have an in depth research of the human body.

Should Human Cloning Be Allowed? - Human Cloning …

Cloning is murder, bringing another human being in to the world so it can be used as an experiment, a thing so when you need a new arm or kidney, you can take it off of another human, alive souly for this purpose.

Should human cloning be allowed? - BBC News

Thank you for the help with my report with cloning humans and animals. i think that GM is a lot safer than cloning though. i think that cloning using Somatic cell nuclear transfer is not as good as natural cloning. somatic cell nuclear transfer is more about using a somatic cell and and transplanting a nucleas which is not how we were meant to be.