Evolution: Science or Creation Story? - Faith Facts
Since the impossibility of spontaneous generation is a conclusion that leads to a supernatural creative act by God, it is a conclusion that many choose not to accept. It carries with it what are felt to be, in the present politically correct climate, undesirable philosophic and religious implications. It is for that unfortunate and illogical reason most scientists continue to cling to the unscientific, disproved theory that life arose from non-life through spontaneous generation.
Creation vs. Evolution - Home | Facebook
One argument against Creation is the theory of Evolution, which is defined as "a theory that the various types of animals and plants have their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishab...
Despite scientific evidence to the contrary, however, there are those who continue to believe in evolution, and are therefore forced to accept and defend some form of spontaneous generation. The reason for this dogmatic adherence to spontaneous generation is eloquently pointed out by George Wald: "When it comes to the origin of life there are only two possibilities: Creation or spontaneous generation. There is no third way. Spontaneous generation was disproved one hundred years ago, but that leads us to only one other conclusion, that of supernatural creation. We cannot accept that on philosophical grounds; therefore, we choose to believe the impossible: That life arose spontaneously by chance!" According to Wald, its not about discovering the truth through the finding of fact, its not a matter of evidence, not a matter of science its a matter of philosophy! Like George Wald, many people do not like the alternative: that all life on earth was created by God. So, as Wald said, they are willing to "believe the impossible."
Creation vs Evolution Chart - Clearview Baptist Church
Yes, we know that the books supporting evolution contain much more information than two pictures. However, from this foundation, the authors only apply the facts in their books to the theory of evolution model. We are not aware of any public school text that mentions another model, like the Bibles creation account. That is a primary reason for creating this page.
Creation vs. Evolution (97 books) - Goodreads
By the way, we realize that many of the writings that support the Bibles creation account also have flimsy or questionable evidence. We are trying to break out of that behavior pattern.
Creation vs. Evolution: What saith the Scriptures - Diane …
Which prove neither wrong and belief in both at the same time One approach would be to believe that when God when created the trees in 4004 BCE, he would have formed them complete with growth rings.
Christ Created -- Creation vs. Evolution: An Index to …
This process must precede belief regarding the creationism vs evolution controversy; a priori belief should not be used to twist our reasoning or shoehorn facts.
Creation vs evolution | Sheepish discernments
evolution impact how a person views the world?Return to:
What does the Bible say about Creation vs.
Posts about Creation vs evolution written by sheepishdiscernments
For example, if you observe a discussion between two people regarding whether the Bibles creation account or the theory of evolution is correct, they will not be debating whether a species of clam can develop larger ridges in its shell! (A mcroevolution topic.) They will be discussing and These are abiogenesis and mcroevolution topics, respectively. There is no empirical (reproducible and testable) proof for abiogenesis or mcroevolution. So, the person supporting evolution will typically turn the argument around to mcroevolution, where some evidence exists. Please be aware that if someone attempts to justify the theory of evolution by showing how mcroevolution works, they are changing the topic on you and not proving anything.