Internet Privacy Awareness and Concerns among College …
The stunning growth of Internet usage in some countries is also raising concerns about privacy. The qualities that make computer networks such powerful tools for improving efficiency and living standards also give them extraordinary power to collect, store, or distribute medical data, financial data, and other personal or biographical information. Many individuals and consumer groups are calling for new privacy safeguards for the Internet and other computer networks.
Analysis of Internet Users’ Level of Online Privacy Concerns
Statements about privacy can be either descriptive or normative,depending on whether they are used to describe the way people definesituations and conditions of privacy and the way they value them, orare used to indicate that there ought to be constraints on the use ofinformation or information processing. Informational privacy in anormative sense refers typically to a non-absolute moral right ofpersons to have direct or indirect control over access to (1)information about oneself, (2) situations in which others couldacquire information about oneself, and (3) technology that can be usedto generate, process or disseminate information about oneself.
A growing number of software tools are available that provide someform of privacy (usually anonymity) for their users, such tools arecommonly known as privacy enhancing technologies (Danezis &Gürses 2010, Other Internet Resources). Examples includecommunication-anonymizing tools such as Tor (Dingledine, Mathewson,& Syverson 2004) and Freenet (Clarke et al. 2001), andidentity-management systems for which many commercial softwarepackages exist (see below). Communication anonymizing tools allowusers to anonymously browse the web (with Tor) or anonymously sharecontent (Freenet). They employ a number of cryptographic techniquesand security protocols in order to ensure their goal of anonymouscommunication. Both systems use the property that numerous users usethe system at the same time which provides -anonymity (Sweeney2002): no individual can be uniquely distinguished from a group ofsize , for large values for . Depending on the system,the value of can vary between a few hundred to hundreds ofthousands. In Tor, messages are encrypted and routed along numerousdifferent computers, thereby obscuring the original sender of themessage (and thus providing anonymity). Similarly, in Freenet contentis stored in encrypted form from all users of the system. Since usersthemselves do not have the necessary decryption keys, they do not knowwhat kind of content is stored, by the system, on their owncomputer. This provides plausible deniability and privacy. The systemcan at any time retrieve the encrypted content and send it todifferent Freenet users.
World's Top Privacy Experts Worry About Internet Of …
The Internet, originally conceived in the 1960s and developed inthe 1980s as a scientific network for exchanging information, was notdesigned for the purpose of separating information flows (Michener1999). The World Wide Web of today was not foreseen, and neither wasthe possibility of misuse of the Internet. Social network sitesemerged for use within a community of people who knew each other inreal life—at first, mostly in academic settings—ratherthan being developed for a worldwide community of users (Ellison2007). It was assumed that sharing with close friends would not causeany harm, and privacy and security only appeared on the agenda whenthe network grew larger. This means that privacy concerns often had tobe dealt with as add-ons rather than by-design.
Criticism of Google - Wikipedia
Perhaps, theparticipants that are more aware of and concerned with Internet privacy may also be morefamiliar with privacy assurance mechanisms and techniques.
Parent Concerns | Common Sense Media