Major Ethical Dilemmas in Nursing - My Excite

Burkemper, E. M. (2002) Familytherapists’ ethical decision-making processes

Ethical Dilemmas Related to Disclosure Issues: …

Although I had a lot of objections to Grassian's book, I did like its structure, which featured dilemmas, historical theories in ethics, and then selected moral problems.

Ethical Dilemmas Related to Disclosure Issues: Sex Addiction

Such moral dilemmas with a conflict between means and ends cannot simply be "solved." Ethical theories that seem to provide clear cut solutions will leave out some aspect of moral life: leave out the dimension of the moral judgment of action, while may deny that consequences are of any concern.

What is common to the two well-known cases is conflict. In eachcase, an agent regards herself as having moral reasons to do each oftwo actions, but doing both actions is not possible. Ethicists havecalled situations like these moral dilemmas. The crucialfeatures of a moral dilemma are these: the agent is required to do eachof two (or more) actions; the agent can do each of the actions; but theagent cannot do both (or all) of the actions. The agent thus seemscondemned to moral failure; no matter what she does, she will dosomething wrong (or fail to do something that she ought to do).


Let’s start with the abstract classics

DECIDE: In this approach, D is for defining the Dilemma, E is for the Ethical principle being violated, C is for highlighting the Choices that are present to resolve the dilemma. I is for the impact each choice may have, D is for making a decision based on the assessment of different choices and E is to assess the effect of the decision.

Robot Cars And Fake Ethical Dilemmas - Forbes

PEPSI: In this approach the P is for what the Problem is , E is for the Ethical principle being violated, P is to know different Perspectives related to the dilemma, S is for the different solutions available and I is for the possible impact of each solution.

Nursing Ethics - Ethical Dilemmas Faced By Nurses Everyday

the good": Our duty is to do what is right; but as a practical matter, we would just as soon have things turn out as well as possible -- as we see in the quote from Machiavelli in the epigraph above, where "it is the result that renders the verdict."Hence the dilemma: If doing what is right produces something bad, or if doing what is wrong produces something good, the force of moral obligation may seem balanced by the of the good end.

Ethics is the study of practical reasoning

We shall return to the issue of whether it is possible to precludegenuine moral dilemmas. But what about the desirability of doing so?Why have ethicists thought that their theories should preclude thepossibility of dilemmas? At the intuitive level, the existence ofmoral dilemmas suggests some sort of inconsistency. An agent caught ina genuine dilemma is required to do each of two acts but cannot doboth. And since he cannot do both, not doing one is a condition ofdoing the other. Thus, it seems that the same act is both required andforbidden. But exposing a logical inconsistency takes some work; forinitial inspection reveals that the inconsistency intuitively felt isnot present. Allowing OA to designate that the agent inquestion ought to do A (or is morally obligated to doA, or is morally required to do A), that OAand OB are both true is not itself inconsistent, even if oneadds that it is not possible for the agent to do both A andB. And even if the situation is appropriately described asOA and O¬A, that is not acontradiction; the contradictory of OA is¬OA. (See Marcus 1980 and McConnell 1978, p. 273.)

Nurses face ethical dilemmas on a daily basis

Moral dilemmas are thought experiments which ask you to imagine a difficult situation and decide what you think the morally correct course of action would be. There are no truly ‘right’ answers to these questions, as they often ask you to compare two different moral imperatives and choose which one you feel is most important.